We make software in this category, so we have a point of view. Use these questions on every vendor, including us.
Your software is part of how you look neutral. If one spouse sees more, or feels the tool favors the other side, you've got a problem no feature can fix. So for a solo mediator, the first question is whether the tool treats both parties the same.
Does each spouse answer the same intake in the same format? A form that assumes a "petitioner" and a "respondent" can make one person feel like the opponent.
When a number is released, do both parties see it together? Can either one see that the other has seen it?
Your notes from a caucus with one party must never reach the other. Ask exactly how they're separated, and try to break it yourself by logging in as each spouse.
Be wary of a tool that declares one outcome the "best" or "fair" one. It should show what each option does, and leave the decision with the parties.
If someone later says a number was wrong, can you show where each figure came from and when it was shared?
You're also the admin, the bookkeeper and the IT department. So be honest about what you'll really use:
Many of your clients are upset, tired and using a phone. Before you buy, have someone who isn't technical try to create an account, upload a photographed statement, and find what you've shared with them.
Set up a practice case and log in as each spouse on your own phone. If anything would make you uneasy if a real client saw it, raise it with the vendor before going further.
Unequal access, one-sided forms and built-in recommendations can make a party feel the process favors the other side, so check how the tool treats both spouses.
Not always. Many solos need simple scheduling and billing, plus shared figures and private notes, more than a full firm system.
Log in as each spouse and check that each sees only what they should, especially that caucus notes stay private.